Orhan Pamuk’s recognition and the complex world we live in..

..the characters in my novel are groaning under the burden of universal ideas. Overtaxing yourself with powerful ideas is practically a Turkish passion

Orhan Pamuk, “who in the quest for the melancholic soul of his native city has discovered new symbols for the clash and interlacing of cultures” has won this year’s Nobel Prize for Literature.

On pure literary merits, Orhan Pamuk deserves this award. Politics, however, has marred this extraordinary achievement of a fearless writer. The primacy of media in our times confounds opinion and ‘truth’ itself. That Pamuk denounced the fatwa against Rushdie is not the point. Calling for a public debate on the treatment of Armenians by pre-modern Turkish state was no sin, nor a call for national humiliation as the hardliners in Turkey claim. Nevertheless, given the attitudes of European Union bigwigs to Turkey, often bordering on racism and Islamophobia, Pamuk’s award is seen by many as undermining Turkey that has done more than its capacity to undertake reform.

What a pity that Orhan Pamuk’s genuine brilliance as a writer has been overshadowed by European prejudice, media naivete as well as reinforcement of bias; and above all Turkey’s bruised self-image further complicates the reality.

Pamuk recreates and redefines the magic of Istanbul, a fabulous spot on the globe. He digs the past, ruffles the present and swims with the tense undercurrents of a “secular” Turkey that continues to negotiate its Islamic identity. His novels therefore acquire a larger meaning where art and religion confront politics and love founders at the rocks of power and compromise. Small wonder that his books have been so popular globally and his technique adding additional dimensions to what is known as a “novel”.

I am familiar with only two of his novels that were internationally acclaimed much before the Nobel Prize.  Pamuk’s Snow, set in the north-eastern city of Kars, narrates the tensions between Turkey’s urban secular elite and their under-estimated Islamist opponents. The novel unpacks themes of religion, political identity, melancholy and betrayal.

My Name is Red, a murder mystery and a love story at the same time explored the perils of religious mores of sixteenth-century Istanbul. A unique style of novel writing that intersected on art, religion, love, and power.

Pamuk lives for his writing. Despite his training as an architect, he chose to be a full-time writer. Committed and obsessed with his passion for writing he aptly remarked in an interview, “I don’t really fit into the mould, though. I chose art rather than the positivist-rationalist life of an engineer, the one that was meant for me.”

Pamuk got what he deserved and let’s hope that his recognition is viewed in the right perspective.

It is not just Pamuk but Istanbul and its rich mosaic of cultures and movements that has been rewarded.

Published in: on October 14, 2006 at 7:50 pm  Comments (5)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://razarumi.wordpress.com/2006/10/14/orhan-pamuks-recognition-and-the-complex-world-we-live-in/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

5 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. I consider my self unfortunate. Yet to read any of his works. Will surely try to get the Red & others. Yes lot of politics.
    Also, the photograph of Istanbul you have put is beautiful. Blue Mosque looks elegant from all angles.

  2. Adnan: thanks for visiting. Yes you should read Pamuk’s works. My favourite is Red – especially if you like Islamic miniatures. Istanbul photo is not mine and I will add the credit. Am glad I psosted a picture of Istanbul that is one of the finest cities of the world.

  3. […] On pure literary merits, Orhan Pamuk deserves this award. Politics, however, has marred this extraordinary achievement of a fearless writer. The primacy of media in our times confounds opinion and ‘truth’ itself. That Pamuk denou … I think it’s very interestingLink to original article […]

  4. Just finished reading “Snow.” Orhan Pamuk is a “Turkish” author and his material is contemporary Turkey. But the themes and conflicts are so much a part of our part of the world. The descriptions of this all-pervasive melancholy could have been of any of our developing nations. That’s what makes Pamuk more than just a “Turkish” voice.

  5. Dear Amryta
    You are absolutely right. Like all great writers Pamuk transcends borders and cultures. He brings out the soul of contemporary Turkey and the struggles that are taking place there.

    please keep visiting

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: